This is follow-up to the
earlier polls about modifying
merit_brush_recs.
Thank you to everyone who voted in the polls and left comments!
ranalore and I have reviewed all the feedback.
Time for more voting!
Templates:
We'll allow people to use AO3's "share" template. And if other sites generate a similar template that includes basic info (creator, title, link, etc.), that's also fine to use.
This poll is closed.
This poll is anonymous.
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 17
If a site (for example, Twitter) doesn't offer something like a "share" template, should there be a community template?
If there's a community template (to use for sites that don't offer a template), which fields should be included?
View Answerstitle
14 (82.4%)
creator link(s)
10 (58.8%)
canon (drama, novel, RPF, etc.)
16 (94.1%)
type (fanart, fanfic, fanvid, etc.)
14 (82.4%)
category (F/F, gen, M/M)
3 (17.6%)
length/size
8 (47.1%)
characters/ships (Bai Yu, Shen Wei, Chu Shuzhi/Guo Changcheng, etc.)
15 (88.2%)
rating (explicit, mature, not rated, NSFW, etc.)
12 (70.6%)
warnings (graphic violence, rape/non-con, no warnings apply, etc.)
11 (64.7%)
themes (angst, AU: canon divergence, D/s, hope, smut, post canon, etc.)
2 (11.8%)
collection (520, Yuletide, Sundial Exchange, etc.)
1 (5.9%)
summary
9 (52.9%)
why I like this (in current template called "why I'm reccing this")
14 (82.4%)
fanwork link(s)
16 (94.1%)
something else which I will explain in comments
0 (0.0%)
If there's a community template (to use for sites that don't offer a template), should using the template be optional?
If the community template is optional, what information do you feel is essential for a poster to include in a recommendation post?
View Answerstitle
13 (81.2%)
creator link(s)
6 (37.5%)
canon (drama, novel, RPF, etc.)
12 (75.0%)
type (fanart, fanfic, fanvid, etc.)
12 (75.0%)
category (F/F, gen, M/M)
2 (12.5%)
length/size
1 (6.2%)
characters/ships (Bai Yu, Shen Wei, Chu Shuzhi/Guo Changcheng, etc.)
10 (62.5%)
rating (explicit, mature, not rated, NSFW, etc.)
8 (50.0%)
warnings (graphic violence, rape/non-con, no warnings apply, etc.)
9 (56.2%)
themes (angst, AU: canon divergence, D/s, hope, smut, post canon, etc.)
0 (0.0%)
collection (520, Yuletide, Sundial Exchange, etc.)
0 (0.0%)
summary
4 (25.0%)
why I like this (in current template called "why I'm reccing this")
6 (37.5%)
fanwork link(s)
16 (100.0%)
something else which I will explain in comments
0 (0.0%)
Tags:
Some people indicated they never use the tags, others find some of the tags useful.
ranalore and I agree that we don't need all of the existing tag categories, but we want to retain the ones people use.
In order for a recommendation post to have tags, the required information has to be somewhere in the post. For example, if there is a tag for canon (drama, novel, RPF, etc.), the canon the fanwork was created for needs to be in the post. The AO3 "share" template includes canon, but for fanworks on other sites, the poster may need to indicate the canon. This is true even if a mod tags the post: the tag can't be added if the information isn't in the recommendation post.
You can see the existing tag categories and tags
here.
This poll is closed.
This poll is anonymous.
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 18
Which tag categories should definitely be kept?
View Answerscanon (drama, novel, rpf, etc.)
17 (94.4%)
category (f/f, gen, m/m)
4 (22.2%)
character (bai yu, shen wei, etc.)
6 (33.3%)
creator
3 (16.7%)
length (100+k words, 1k-5k words, etc.)
3 (16.7%)
rating (explicit, mature, not rated, nsfw, etc.)
6 (33.3%)
runtime (10:00-30:00 minutes, 3:01-5:00 minutes, etc.)
1 (5.6%)
ship (chu shuzhi/guo changcheng, shen wei/ye zun, etc.)
14 (77.8%)
theme (angst, au:canon divergence, d/s, hope, smut, post canon, etc.)
4 (22.2%)
type (fanart, fanfic, fanvid, etc.)
17 (94.4%)
warning (graphic violence, rape/non-con, no warnings apply, etc.)
2 (11.1%)
Which tag categories should be deleted?
View Answerscanon (drama, novel, rpf, etc.)
1 (10.0%)
category (f/f, gen, m/m)
6 (60.0%)
character (bai yu, shen wei, etc.)
2 (20.0%)
creator
7 (70.0%)
length (100+k words, 1k-5k words, etc.)
5 (50.0%)
rating (explicit, mature, not rated, nsfw, etc.)
4 (40.0%)
runtime (10:00-30:00 minutes, 3:01-5:00 minutes, etc.)
7 (70.0%)
ship (chu shuzhi/guo changcheng, shen wei/ye zun, etc.)
1 (10.0%)
theme (angst, au:canon divergence, d/s, hope, smut, post canon, etc.)
5 (50.0%)
type (fanart, fanfic, fanvid, etc.)
0 (0.0%)
warning (graphic violence, rape/non-con, no warnings apply, etc.)
8 (80.0%)
We are considering renaming the "theme:" tag. Which name do you prefer?
View Answersgenre
6 (40.0%)
trope
2 (13.3%)
something else which I will list in the comments
0 (0.0%)
don't rename it (keep it as "theme:")
7 (46.7%)
Please indicate your preference for who tags the posts:
View AnswersI want to tag my own posts, including asking the mods to create new tags, and I will make my own corrections to the tags when needed
0 (0.0%)
I want to tag my own posts, ask the mods to create new tags, and let the mods handle corrections to the tags when needed
11 (68.8%)
I want the mods to tag my posts
5 (31.2%)
The polls will be open for voting through 10 February 2021.
What time is that for me?Next steps: The mods will revise and edit the community's guidelines based on the feedback we get from these polls (which I think will be the last ones we need for now), and we'll announce the results and changes.
There was excellent feedback with the first set of polls - thank you to everyone who commented! Some things raised in those comments aren't addressed here, but that doesn't mean they've been ignored. We agreed with most of the suggestions for making the community less confusing, and we'll be revising the guidelines accordingly. The template and the tags emerged as the two areas where we need your input - what do you need to make posting and finding recs easier than it is now.
If you have additional comments about the community in general -- not just about the templates and tags -- feel free to comment on this post! Or you can comment on the existing
guidelines post (which hasn't been revised yet) where comments are screened.